I recently drafted the text for Snipe for a forthcoming Birds of
Hertfordshire. A tale of woe. Sage (1959) stated
that ‘There is little doubt that the Snipe is a widespread breeding bird in
suitable localities over the county’.
With the last proven breeding in the county at Rye Meads in 1998, the
Snipe is now extinct locally as a breeding bird. During the 1988-92 Atlas,
Snipe bred at Rye Meads, King’s Meads, Sawbridgeworth Marsh and Standon
Lordship. I knew all of these sites well
when Snipe were breeding, so today I went out to take a look at what had
changed.
Rye Meads looks great
at the moment; nicely flooded and with lots of Snipe. This used to be a great site for breeding
Snipe but became unmanaged during the 1980s with the result that they ceased
breeding. In the early 1990s, Rye Meads
was acquired as a nature reserve by the Wildlife Trust. With management back in place, Snipe returned
and up to 3 pairs bred during that decade but ceased to breed again by the
early 00s. Sawbridgeworth Marsh today
also looked nice and wet, but the over-riding impression since Snipe last bred
was one of changing vegetation. Some
excellent work is being put in to maintain a small area of fen meadow but
overall there is a spread of coarse vegetation and scrub. During
my years at the Wildlife Trust, King’s Meads was one of the sites I put a lot
of effort into acquiring as a nature reserve in the early 90s. I remember complaining publicly that a
management change by Thames Water had resulted in the loss of breeding Snipe
and Garganey. They were on the phone
pronto, balling me out, but the fact remains that it happened. Today, at King’s
Mead there is serious deterioration of the meadow sward; where once there was
tussocky grass, Adder’s-tongue Fern and Snipe, today there is a sea of sedge and
rush. Finally, I looked at Standon
Lordship, the one site in private ownership rather than a nature reserve. The old Snipe meadow was partly under willow
plantation, partly grazed to billiard table.
The reasons for the
loss of Snipe at each of these sites is, in my view, as clear as the beak on
its head: inappropriate management of either water or sward. We have come to expect losses on private land
through agricultural intensification but the sad truth is that, on the other
side, we also have losses at nature reserves due to insufficient management. So, back to the Snipe text and tell it how it
is. Anything we can do about the
situation? Perhaps, we shall see.
3 comments:
I think you are being a bit unfair to put the label of inappropriate management on Sawbridgeworth Marsh. The team there do a consistently excellent job of managing the reserve on a limited budget, and have had some success. There was also a site further down the valley (on the Essex side) that attracted some waders but they lost the young due to predation.
They have to get the water levels DOWN at Rye Meads in late autumn (TW is putting too much water into the 'back stream') so they can get in and cut the 2nd Meadow (it's currently too wet).
The reed is marching on and all the stuff like great willowherb and meadow rue would seem to be vanishing. I was there on the Sat. before Xmas and the first meadow looked lovely but is it too small for breeding snipe without a decent 2nd meadow (rather than a reedbed)?
Do breeding Snipe and Redshank need some patches of greater cover (for nest and chick protection) than currently afforded by the first meadow? Could low electric exclusion fences (that the buffalo can nibble beneath) do the job?
Hi DD, I agree with you - the local team are doing a good job but in a very limited area. My point is that the unmanaged area is expanding and changing in character so that overall the site is less attractive to Snipe. EWT should put more resource into site management, to knock back natural succession. You mention limited budget - but isn't the site in HLS?
Post a Comment